what did the terrorists use to hijack the planes

Following the September 11th set on, authorities authorities declared that the weapons used to hijack the planes that crashed into World Trade Centre were plastic knives and box cutters. The story almost plastic knives and box cutters, implements which passengers then were not legally restricted from bring through security checkpoints at airports, was relentlessly drummed into the public's mind by ii of the highest officials in the regime. John Ashcroft, the chaser general, Donald Rumsfeld, the Secretarial assistant of Defence force.

Ashcroft told ABC News on September 15th that "investigators believed that each of the commandeered planes had been hijacked past groups of three to 6 men armed with box cutters and plastic knives." Donald Rumsfeld told Fox News on September 16th, that the hijackers used weapons that are distinctively unlike - - plastic knives." On October ninth, he suggested to Dan Rather on CBS News "plastic knives and the utilise of a U.S. airliner filled with American people as a missile [were used] to destroy a World Trade Centre." On Nov 7th, he described to Jim Lehrer on PBS " 1 of our planes is used as a missile to fly into our edifice and into the Earth Merchandise Center. It was beyond i's imagination that plastic knives and our own commercial aircraft filled with our own people would be used as the implement of state of war."

Really, it was their imagination, not established facts, that informed the world that the hijackers had used plastic knives and box cutters to commandeer the two airliners that had destroyed the twin towers of the Globe Trade Center. Not a scintilla of evidence had been found then— or to date— that either plastic knives or box cutters were used by whatsoever of the ten hijackers who crashed United Airlines flight 175 and American Airlines Flight 11 into the Earth Trade Center. No box cutters or plastic knives were found in the debris. Nor were the cockpit vocalisation recorders ever found from Flight 11 and Flying 175. No witnesses, either passengers or crew members, on either flying eleven or flight 175 ever reported any hijacker having a box cutter or a plastic knife.
Both United Airlines flight 175 and American Airlines Flying 11 had departed from Boston. In one case both Boeing 767s had reached their cruising altitudes, the hijackers took command of them past unknown means without whatever of the four pilots alert the footing controllers, even though they had open radios. Both airliners then turned off their transponders and disappeared from the computerized radar screens.

No message was always received from flight 175 that mentioned any weapons. So, for all anyone knows, the hijackers may have used guns, grenades, poison gas or any other weapon

An executive summary of an unpublished FAA memo stated:

"At approximately 9:18 am, it was reported that 2 coiffure members in the cockpit were stabbed. The flight then descended with no communications from the flight crew members. The American Airlines FAA Chief Security Inspector (PFI) was notified past Suzanne Clark of American airlines Corporate Headquarters that an on board flying attendant contacted American Airlines Functioning Center and informed that a passenger located in seat 10B shot and killed a passenger in 9B at 9:20 am. The rider killed was Daniel Lewin shot past Satam al-Suqama. One bullet was reported to have been fired."
The information came from two jail cell telephone calls made by flight attendants, Betty Ong and Madeline Amy Sweeney, to Americal Airlines basis controllers. Ong, who was in the first class compartment— and the just witness to the assault on the cockpit. She reported that she had seen four hijackers come up from first-grade seats, kill a passenger seated behind them, and use a chemical weapon which she described every bit "some sort of spray" that made her eyes burn and made information technology hard for her to breathe." Madeline Amy Sweeney, the flight attendant in the rear compartment, call was not recorded. Co-ordinate to the ground controller, she said that the pilots, another flight attendant and a passenger had been stabbed or killed.
The FAA later on said that the report of a gun shot was an mistake proceeding from a "miscommunication". The ground controller did not call back a gun shot or a bullet beingness mentioned.
In any case, there were no box cutters or plastics knives on flying xi were used.

Two other flights were hijacked that forenoon, American Airlines flight 77, a Boeing 757 departing from Virginia, and United Airlines Flying 93, a Boeing 757 departing from Newark. On flying 77, which crashed into the Pentagon, one unmarried passenger, Barbara Olsen, reported on weapons that some of the five hijackers had in the back of the plane. She told her husband, Theodore Olsen, on a cell phone that the hijackers who herded her and other the passengers into the dorsum of the plane had ii kind of weapons: knives and cardboard cutters (presumably box cutters). She did non say anything near the other hijackers in the cockpit and she apparently did not even know that they were piloting the plane. Nor did whatever other passenger or crew fellow member on Flying 77 depict the hijackers' weapons. It cannot exist assumed that all the hijackers on the aeroplane had similar weapons. The hijackers assaulting the cockpit might have needed more sophisticated weaponry to rapidly stun or kill the pilots.
On flight 93, the Boeing 757 which crashed near Pittsburgh, the flight attendant reported over a prison cell phone that a hijacker in her aeroplane had a "flop strapped on." Some unidentified person also said over the loud speaker that there was a "bomb" aboard the plane. A passenger, Todd Beamer, talked over a cell phone about the "terrorist with a bomb." Another passenger, Tom Burnett, told his married woman over a cell telephone that he had heard that a pilot had been "knifed." No passenger or crew member described either box cutters or plastic knives equally weapons and, as far as is known, no box cutters of plastic knives been recovered from the wreckage.

Like weapons thus were not reported in the different flights. A paralytic chemical spray was described in the front compartment of flying 11, knives and bill of fare cutters was described in the rear compartment of Flying 77 and a bomb was described on flying 93. Nor is in that location whatever reason to assume that different hijackers on different planes leaving from different airports would utilise the same weaponry. Atta and Alomari, for case, having made a detour to Portland, might take obtained weapons unavailable to the hijackers in Virginia and New Bailiwick of jersey.)

In any case, the Ashcroft'south story that the hijackers used box-cutters and plastic knives in the attack on the World Trade Heart is a functional fictoid. In this instance, the function was diversion. This fictoid serves to divert public attentions from the responsibility, and legal liability, of the regime and airlines to prevent major weapons— such as guns, bombs, chemical sprays and hunting knives from being carried aboard airplanes. If such illegal devices had been smuggled aboard the planes, the liability could amount to billions of dollars. If, , on the other hand, it could exist disseminated that the hijackers had only used plastic knives, such as those provided past the airlines for meals, or box cutters, which were allowed on planes, neither the airlines, the screeners at the airport, or the FAA, which regulates the safety of airports, could be held legally responsible. Paul Pillar, who had headed the CIA's counter-terrorism, could thus explain that"the attack that killed almost iv,000 people used box cutters." This press accepted it equally established fact. The New York Times, for example, reported "the hijackers did not use firearms, which would probably have been detected, but apparently wielded box-cutter knives of the type that were so allowed on lath but are now banned."

What made the box cutter and and plastic knives fictoid particularly welcome was that the FAA had found massive failures of airport screeners to discover weapons prior to the attacks. Such tests were conducted by FAA surreptitious "Cerise Teams." In 1998, for example, 1 FAA Read team leader told the New York Times, "we were successful in getting major weapons— guns and bombs--aboard planes at least 85 percent the time." The failure rate was every bit high as 97 pct at some airports. Nor was this vulnerability corrected before September 11th. FAA Special Agent Bogdan Dzakovic, according to United states of america TODAY, said that FAA officials had ignored security problems before the terrorist attacks.
The fictoid successfully deflected from this gaping hole in security.

Any further examples of uncorrected fictoids?


Your email (required):

martinanobaciping.blogspot.com

Source: http://www.edwardjayepstein.com/nether_fictoid9.htm

Share this post